Nearly 2 Billion Women Worldwide Are Struggling, Suffering
05.03.2015 15:10
While International
Women's Day this Sunday will focus mostly
on how the world thinks women are doing,
it's important to understand how the
women of the world think they are doing.
The best way to find this out is to ask
them.
This International Women's Day, more
than one in four women worldwide -- or
about 620 million women -- rate their lives
positively enough to be considered
"thriving." The life ratings of the rest -- or
about 2 billion women -- place them in a
category of "struggling" or "suffering."
These ratings have been remarkably
stable for the past several years.
Since 2005, Gallup has conducted
nationally representative surveys in more
than 160 countries asking women (and
men) to evaluate their current and future
lives on a ladder scale with steps
numbered from 0 to 10, based on the
Cantril Self-Anchoring Striving Scale.
Gallup classifies them as either "thriving,"
"struggling" or "suffering." People are
considered thriving if they rate their
current lives a 7 or higher and their lives
in five years an 8 or higher.
Thriving Highest Among Women in
Iceland, Sweden
The countries where the highest
percentages of women are thriving tend to
be primarily wealthy, developed countries.
Iceland and Sweden have the highest
percentages in the world. Many of these
countries also score well on the U.N.'s
Human Development Index, suggesting
that what makes women's lives better
makes people's lives better in general. For
example, in Sweden, where three in four
women are thriving, the employment rate
for women is among the highest in the
world.
The countries where women rate their
lives the worst tend to be experiencing
instability, such as Afghanistan, where
coincidentally no women rate their lives
positively enough to be considered
thriving . Women in economically
devastated Greece and Ukraine are also
more than twice as likely to be suffering
than the global average.
Iraqi Women Most Likely to Experience
Negative Emotions
While the majority of women worldwide
fall into the struggling or suffering
category, based on their life evaluations,
only 20% to 35% worldwide say they
experienced a lot of negative emotions --
stress, sadness, physical pain, worry and
anger -- the day before the interview.
Again, in countries where there is
considerable instability -- militarily,
economically or politically -- women are
more likely to report experiencing
negative emotions. Women in war-torn
Iraq, for example, have the highest
Negative Experience Index scores of all
women in the world. The countries
reporting the lowest negative emotions
are former Soviet Union countries, which
does not mean that they report high
positive emotions; instead, these
countries typically report low emotions
overall.
Women Around the World Likely to
Experience Positive Emotions
Despite the tough conditions in so many
countries around the world, most women
are still finding a way to live their lives
well. At least 70% of women worldwide
say they were treated with a great deal of
respect, smiled or laughed a lot,
experienced enjoyment or felt well-rested
the day before the survey. Furthermore,
50% of women say they learned or did
something interesting the day before the
interview.
Women are most likely to say they had
these positive experiences in Latin
American countries, where nine of the top
10 countries in the world for positive
experiences are located. Women in Syria
have the lowest Positive Experience Index
score -- an all-time low for any country
Gallup has measured.
Implications
How women view their lives varies a great
deal by the relative wealth, development
and stability of the countries they live in.
But the two largest areas where all
women's lives can improve are jobs and
personal safety. The global workforce
consists of 50% more men than women,
and men are almost twice as likely to be
employed full time for an employer.
Encouraging women's participation --
particularly in emerging markets where
gender gaps are widest -- not only can
improve how women are doing, but also
can fuel economic growth in their
countries.
Perhaps even more important is that
women are less likely than men to feel
safe in the cities or areas where they live.
Gallup's macro-level well-being model for
societies suggests that safety and security
is the foundation of a great society -- an
improvement here would pay well-being
dividends not just for women, but for the
society as a whole.
But while significant gender gaps exist in
these two areas, as well as a number of
others, there is remarkable parity in how
women and men rate their lives. This is
true with thriving, struggling, suffering,
negative experiences and positive
experiences.
The most positive finding from these data
is that most women experience a great
deal of positive emotions on any given
day. However, only 50% of women
worldwide report experiencing one of
those positive emotions -- learning and
doing something interesting -- each day.
These data emphasize the importance of
the U.N.'s Sustainable Development Goals
of ensuring inclusive and equitable quality
education and promoting lifelong learning
opportunities for all. Gallup will continue
to monitor how women are doing
worldwide through the best way we know
how, which starts with asking women.
Survey Methods
The most recent results for 2013 are
based on telephone and face-to-face
interviews with 125,839 adults, aged 15
and older, conducted in 2013 in 136
countries and areas. This sample includes
66,313 women. For results based on the
total global sample, one can say with 95%
confidence that the margin of sampling
error is less than ±1 percentage point. For
results based on country-level samples,
the margin of error ranges from a low of
±1.7 percentage points to a high of ±4.2
percentage points. The margin of error
reflects the influence of data weighting.
In addition to sampling error, question
wording and practical difficulties in
conducting surveys can introduce error or
bias into the findings of public opinion
polls. All reported margins of sampling
error include computed design effects for
weighting.